Originally posted by geek at 1-9-2013 09:07
Wander: I think you're probably right. I jumped the gun a bit on that. I guess it was just plain old luck. You win some you lose some.
Regarding the sugardaddy with no sex bit. Apparently, it happens ...
The no sex bit is very true. I mistakenly tried SA and contacted a really hot girl in my price range, but didn't notice she had an "NSA" tag in her profile. Being new to this, I had no idea what all the acronyms meant. All I knew was hot girl I could afford.
Fast forward to the actual meeting, and of course me wanting to jump her bones and her wanting no sex was a bad mix right away. I apologized up front and explained it was my first time and she seemed to be put at ease and we talked at length about SA.
Basically she explained really old guys really just want the happiness and company of a good looking, youthful girl and they enjoy making these girls happy monetarily. While at first it is very shallow, over time companionship becomes very real. They know the sex wouldn't be "genuine" and they want genuine relationships to develop. A lot of times these guys are multiple divorcees, their spouse has passed away, or their families don't take care of them emotionally. It was somewhat sad to hear.
At the end, it was a nice talk and she reminded me NSA = no sexual arrangement. |
